![]() ![]() In the advanced medium-range air-to-air missile, the Navy and Air Force brought highly aligned requirements to Raytheon, and, consequently, development and deployment was relatively smooth.ĭue in part to less commonality, the F-35 joint strike fighter became the poster child for troubled joint programs. Michael O’Hanlon, military analyst at the Brookings Institution, claims a decision-maker’s rule of thumb for a program to be joint should be roughly 90 percent commonality, if not more. The multi-service approach, though a potential game-changer, should be employed cautiously and only after thoroughly analyzing several key parameters.Įven if two or more services are both hungry for the same capability or are driven by closely related missions, different design needs cause potential savings to fade quickly. The cost savings, interoperability advantages and efficiency gains that joint programs can offer will only grow more enticing. defense spending, it will be worth watching how the Pentagon moves forward with joint-service acquisitions. ![]() With downward budgetary pressures on U.S. Originally published in National Defense Magazine. It is our pleasure to share this special anniversary issue of Simulating Reality with our customers, partners, and friends.Pentagon Must Tread Carefully On ‘Joint’ Weapon Acquisitions Introducing the New Special Anniversary Issue!Īs we embark on the beginning of a New Era in simulation & analysis, we also celebrate 50 years in business as an engineering software and services company. Customer success stories and applications.In each issue of Simulating Reality, you will find: Welcome to Simulating Reality, the bi-annual magazine published by MSC Software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |